Greetings Decision maker,
Generative AI offers law firms opportunities to improve efficiency and client service, but ethical risks must be carefully managed. For example, several recent cases resulted in fines for lawyers who provided fictitious citations that were obtained through Gen AI. In response, the American Bar Association issued Formal Opinion 512, reinforcing that ethical obligations under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct remain critical when using Gen AI. Lawyers must ensure accuracy, safeguard client confidentiality, communicate AI use transparently, and uphold reasonable billing practices. Law firms that want to take advantage of AI’s potential must prioritize training, clear policies, and human verification.
To learn more, check out this blog.
|
|
|
|
Prefer video to text? See this video based on the blog: |
|
|
|
If you prefer audio, listen to this podcast based on the blog: |
|
|
|
|
Make Your Voice Heard
Vote in this LinkedIn poll to contribute to the conversation. I will use the responses to inform my articles in Harvard Business Review, Fortune, and Entrepreneur. |
|
|
|
Your Testimonials
You and others who gain value from Disaster Avoidance Experts services and thought leadership occasionally share testimonials about your experience, such as the one below. You can read more testimonials here. |
|
|
|
“I wanted to thank you for speaking recently at our Spring 2024 National Legal Malpractice Conference. We really enjoyed having you and hearing you discuss proximity bias. It was really a worthwhile event and conversation for our panel who really didn't know a great deal about it or a lot of the implications related to it. We really appreciated all the energy and obvious underlying knowledge that you have related to the topic. All of our panelists really enjoyed hearing from you, our guests enjoyed hearing from you, and we look forward to working with you again.”
Jay Reyes, Chief Counsel at the American Bar Association |
|
|
|
My wife and business partner, Agnes Vishnevkin, and Iwere making our plans to travel from our hometown of Columbus, Ohio, to visit my parents for my mom’s 75th birthday in New York City. At the same time, she’s been struggling with a period of back pain for the past two months. Her condition fluctuated, but it was worse again in the days leading up to the trip, so I suggested she should skip the trip. She was quite reluctant to do so, because she was concerned that my mother would be upset. I was surprised how hard it was to convince her to agree to stay home.
This is the kind of situation where she and I differ: I tend to think people will understand and forgive, while she is more worried about others’ judgments. Maybe sometimes I underestimate how judgmental people might be, but in this case I think I was right. Sometimes, we need to reduce our concerns about other people’s opinions and focus on our own self-care. Now, that doesn’t mean being a jerk, there has to be a balance, but in this case the balance to me was clearly toward self-care. What do you think should be the balance between self-care and consideration of other people’s feelings?
|
 |
|
|
|
Would love to get your feedback on what you found most useful about this edition of the “Wise Decision Maker Guide” - simply reply to this email.
Decisively Yours,
Dr. Gleb
|
|
|
|
Dr. Gleb Tsipursky
CEO of Disaster Avoidance Experts
PS: Are we connected on LinkedIn? If not, please add me.
Did you miss out on reading any of my bestselling books? |
|
|
|
Disaster Avoidance Experts is a social enterprise dedicated to promoting science-based truth-seeking and wise decision-making. All profits are donated to Intentional Insights, an educational 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and its Pro-Truth Pledge project.
You're getting this email because you indicated that you wanted Dr. Gleb's resources. |
|
|
|
|